Back

Grading guru

Compare and evaluate the quality of written texts based on user-defined criteria and standards.

user
Evaluate the following two texts based on the given criteria:

Text 1:
The sun was setting behind the mountains, casting a warm golden glow across the valley. The birds chirped their evening songs as the gentle breeze rustled through the leaves. It was a peaceful and serene moment, one that filled the heart with joy and contentment.

Text 2:
The sunset was pretty. The birds were singing and the wind was blowing. It made me happy.

Criteria:
1. Descriptive language and imagery
2. Sentence structure and variety
3. Emotional impact and engagement
4. Grammar and punctuation

Based on the provided criteria, here is my assessment:

Descriptive Language and Imagery Text 1 uses more vivid and evocative imagery, describing the "warm golden glow" of the sunset and personifying the birds as "chirping their evening songs." Text 2's description of the sunset as "pretty" is less detailed.

Sentence Structure and Variety
Text 1 has more complex and varied sentences using descriptive phrases. Text 2 uses simpler sentences of similar length and structure.

Emotional Impact and Engagement Text 1 draws the reader into the peaceful, joyful mood of the scene with descriptive words like "serene" and "contentment." Text 2 tells rather than shows the happiness felt, which is less engaging.

Grammar and Punctuation Both texts are grammatically correct with proper punctuation. Text 1 uses more complex punctuation with commas and a semi-colon. Text 2 has simpler punctuation.

In summary, Text 1 rates higher across most criteria with its rich visual imagery, varied sentence types, emotional resonance, and accurate grammar and punctuation. The simplicity of Text 2 suffers from lack of detail and personality. Overall, Text 1 is more descriptive, evocative and engaging based on the criteria.

Here's the evaluation of the two texts based on the given criteria:

Text 1:

  1. Descriptive language and imagery: The text uses vivid descriptive language and imagery, such as "warm golden glow," "birds chirped their evening songs," and "gentle breeze rustled through the leaves." These descriptions help create a clear picture in the reader's mind. (Score: 5/5)

  2. Sentence structure and variety: The text consists of three sentences with varying lengths and structures. It starts with a longer, complex sentence followed by two shorter, simpler sentences. This variety in sentence structure adds a nice flow to the text. (Score: 4/5)

  3. Emotional impact and engagement: The text evokes a sense of peace, joy, and contentment. It engages the reader by appealing to their senses and emotions, making them feel as if they are experiencing the moment themselves. (Score: 5/5)

  4. Grammar and punctuation: The text demonstrates proper grammar and punctuation, with no visible errors. (Score: 5/5)

Text 2:

  1. Descriptive language and imagery: The text lacks detailed descriptive language and imagery. While it mentions the sunset, birds, and wind, it does not provide any further descriptions to help the reader visualize the scene. (Score: 2/5)

  2. Sentence structure and variety: The text consists of three short, simple sentences with little variety in structure. This makes the text feel choppy and less engaging. (Score: 2/5)

  3. Emotional impact and engagement: While the text states that the scene made the narrator happy, it lacks the necessary details and depth to fully engage the reader emotionally. (Score: 2/5)

  4. Grammar and punctuation: The text demonstrates proper grammar and punctuation, with no visible errors. (Score: 5/5)

In conclusion, Text 1 outperforms Text 2 in terms of descriptive language, sentence structure, and emotional impact. Both texts maintain proper grammar and punctuation. Text 1 effectively engages the reader and creates a vivid, emotionally resonant experience, while Text 2 lacks the necessary detail and variety to achieve the same level of engagement.

Based on the given criteria, here's an evaluation of the two texts:

Text 1:

  1. Descriptive language and imagery: Excellent. This text employs rich descriptive language and vivid imagery to paint a picture of the sunset and its surroundings. Phrases like "warm golden glow," "gentle breeze," and "rustled through the leaves" create a clear and engaging visual.

  2. Sentence structure and variety: Good. The text uses a mix of longer and shorter sentences, adding variety and rhythm to the writing. The opening sentence is complex, while the second and third sentences are shorter and more concise.

  3. Emotional impact and engagement: Strong. The imagery and descriptive language evoke a sense of peace, serenity, and contentment. The text effectively engages the reader's emotions by describing the uplifting experience of witnessing a beautiful sunset.

  4. Grammar and punctuation: Excellent. The text is well-written with proper grammar and punctuation, making it easy to read and understand.

Text 2:

  1. Descriptive language and imagery: Limited. This text lacks descriptive language and vivid imagery. It merely states basic observations without providing much detail or painting a clear picture.

  2. Sentence structure and variety: Basic. The text consists of three short, simple sentences without much variation in structure or rhythm.

  3. Emotional impact and engagement: Minimal. While the text conveys a positive emotion ("It made me happy"), it lacks depth and fails to engage the reader's emotions or create a lasting impression.

  4. Grammar and punctuation: Adequate. The grammar and punctuation are correct, but the simplicity of the sentences doesn't allow for much complexity in this aspect.

Overall, Text 1 is significantly stronger than Text 2 across all the given criteria. It employs descriptive language, varied sentence structure, emotional impact, and proper grammar and punctuation to create an engaging and vivid depiction of a sunset scene. Text 2, while grammatically correct, lacks depth, descriptive power, and emotional resonance.

API request

python
import anthropic

  client = anthropic.Anthropic(
      # defaults to os.environ.get("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY")
      api_key="my_api_key",
  )
  message = client.messages.create(
      model="claude-3-opus-20240229",
      max_tokens=2000,
      temperature=0,
      messages=[{"role":"user","content":"Evaluate the following two texts based on the given criteria:\n\nText 1:\nThe sun was setting behind the mountains, casting a warm golden glow across the valley. The birds chirped their evening songs as the gentle breeze rustled through the leaves. It was a peaceful and serene moment, one that filled the heart with joy and contentment.\n\nText 2:\nThe sunset was pretty. The birds were singing and the wind was blowing. It made me happy.\n\nCriteria:\n1. Descriptive language and imagery\n2. Sentence structure and variety\n3. Emotional impact and engagement\n4. Grammar and punctuation"}]
  )
  print(message.content)
typescript
import Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk";

  const anthropic = new Anthropic({
      apiKey: "my_api_key", // defaults to process.env["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"]
  });
  
  const msg = await anthropic.messages.create({
      model: "claude-3-opus-20240229",
      max_tokens: 2000,
      temperature: 0,
      messages: [{"role":"user","content":"Evaluate the following two texts based on the given criteria:\n\nText 1:\nThe sun was setting behind the mountains, casting a warm golden glow across the valley. The birds chirped their evening songs as the gentle breeze rustled through the leaves. It was a peaceful and serene moment, one that filled the heart with joy and contentment.\n\nText 2:\nThe sunset was pretty. The birds were singing and the wind was blowing. It made me happy.\n\nCriteria:\n1. Descriptive language and imagery\n2. Sentence structure and variety\n3. Emotional impact and engagement\n4. Grammar and punctuation"}]
  });
  console.log(msg);